Skip to main content

Complaint : Definition & Meaning Under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973


Section 2(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 defines “complaint” to mean any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.

A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complaint; and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant.

A complaint, as defined in Section 2(d), Cr.P.C., can be made even orally or in writing with a view to taking of action by a Magistrate.

Under Section 2(d), a complaint can be made either orally or in writing by any person. In so far as the complaints under the Cr.P.C. are concerned, criminal action can be set in motion by any person, even by a stranger.

In the strict sense there is no necessity to mention the name of person who has committed the offence in the complaint.

In order to constitute a complaint there should be an allegation made to a Magistrate that some person has committed an offence.

Under the Cr.P.C., a complaint could be made at any time subject to the provisions of Chapter XXXVI : Limitation for taking cognizance of certain offences.

In the case of Mohd. Yousuf Vs. Smt. Afaq Jahan & Anr., 2006 Cr.L.J. 788 (SC), the Apex Court has laid down that there is no particular format for complaint.

A petition containing allegations that the offence has been committed and ending with a prayer that the culprits be suitably dealt with, can be treated as a complaint.



In the case reported as Bhimappa Basappa Bhau Sannavar Vs. Laxman Shivarayappa Samagouda and Ors., AIR 1970 SC 1153 the Apex Court has laid down that to come within the purview of section 2 (d) of Cr.P.C., the complaint is to fulfill following conditions.

(i) An allegation is made orally or in writing,

(ii) This allegation reveals that some person, known or unknown, has committed the offence,

(iii) Such allegation is made to Magistrate,

(iv) The purpose of allegation is that the Magistrate should take action under the law.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Presumptions are the Bats of the Law, Flitting in the Twilight, but Disappearing in the Sunshine of Actual Facts [ORDER]

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -  Section 138 -  failure on the part of the complainant to produce his account statement and absence of entry in accounts maintained by him regarding loan advanced to the accused, does show that there was no material to support the basic facts on which the entire case of the complainant was based. Sufficient material was available on record    whereby the defence of the accused became probable. In such a situation, the presumption under the provisions of the Act ceased to operate and the burden fell upon the complainant to prove his case, which he failed to do by placing on record cogent evidence.

500+ Supreme Court of India Judgments on Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Head Notes & Citations

1. Mallamma (dead) By Lrs. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. [07-04-2014] 

Anticipatory Bail in Attempt to Murder Cases (Section 307 IPC) : What is Important to Note [Case Law]

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 -  Section 438 -   Grant of Anticipatory Bail -  While considering the application under Section 438, the Court has to see the nature and gravity of the accusation and the antecedents of the applicant which includes whether he has been previously undergone imprisonment on conviction in respect of any cognizable offence, the possibility of the applicant fleeing from justice and whether the accusation has been made with an object of injuring or humiliating the applicant by having him so arrested. [Para 12]