Skip to main content

11 Important Supreme Court Cases Reported in (2018) 5 SCC Part 2

1. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of H.P., (2018) 5 SCC 311 

Criminal Trial - Investigation - Videography - Importance of capturing crucial evidence in credible manner - Action plan and phased manner of implementation - Directions issued. 

2. State of T.N. v. Kamala, (2018) 5 SCC 322 

Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - S. 3(1)(ii) - Preventive Detention - COFEPOSA does not require detaining authority to specify period for which a detenu is required to be detained - Not rendered invalid/illegal in absence of such specification; JT 2018 (4) SC 164 

3. Seema Upadhyay v. Union of India, (2018) 5 SCC 325 

Constitution of India, 1950 - Art. 32 - Public Interest Litigation (PIL) - Maintainability - CBI investigation - Oil Adulteration by mafias - Transfer of cash subsidy to intended beneficiaries of kerosene oil - Aadhaar card or through PDS or other credible mechanism - Petitioner was given liberty to approach oil companies; JT 2018 (4) SC 52 : 2018 (5) SCALE 338 

4. Sanjay Kumar Sinha v. Asha Kumari, (2018) 5 SCC 333 

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - S. 125 - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Ss. 24 & 13 - Maintenance granted by Family Court under S. 24, 1955 Act would supersede maintenance granted under S. 125 CrPC; JT 2018 (4) SC 140 

5. Mohd. Akhtar v. State of J&K, (2018) 5 SCC 336 

Constitution of India, 1950 - Arts. 21 & 32 - Abduction, rape and murder of 8 yr old minor girl by juvenile accused - apprehension of no fair trial - members of Bar were protesting against prosecution of the accused - implication/prosecution sought to be given communal overtones - Prayer for transfer of case - security to victims’ family members, her counsel and another person assisting them - strengthening of security in juvenile home - accepted - shall be done keeping in view care and protection of children. 

6. Baxis Singh v. Sukhdev Singh, (2018) 5 SCC 338 

Civil Procedure Code, 1908- S. 9 - Abuse of Process of Court - Suppression of Material Facts - Suit for Specific Performance of Contract on basis of a power of attorney - Title and possession regarding suit land already stood adjudicated in favour of another person - High Court order setting aside decree of specific performance, affirmed. 

7. Asok Pande v. Supreme Court of India, (2018) 5 SCC 341 

Supreme Court Rules, 2013 - Or. 6 Rr. 1, 2 & 4 - Constitution of Benches of Supreme Court is exclusively in domain of prerogative powers of Chief Justice; JT 2018 (4) SC 154 

8. R. Kasthuri v. M. Kasthuri, (2018) 5 SCC 353 

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - S. 9 - Maintainability of Civil Suit - Dispute principally as to succession to property - Question of legitimacy / legal status of parties - Legal heirs of deceased person - could only be resolved vide a civil suit; AIR 2018 SC 786 

9. Ashim Ranjan Das v. Shibu Bodhak, (2018) 5 SCC 356 

Tenancy and Land Laws - Judicial Interference / Validity - Necessary / Proper parties; AIR 2018 SC 1649 : 2018 (5) SCALE 350 

10. Aparbal Yadav v. State of U.P., (2018) 5 SCC 363 

Constitution of India, 1950 - Art. 226 - Exercise of power by High Court; JT 2018 (4) SC 236 

11. Bharatiya Janata Party v. State of W.B., (2018) 5 SCC 365 

Election - Incidents of Violence - Statute empowered the Election Commissioner to pass appropriate orders; AIR 2018 SC 1914 : JT 2018 (4) SC 133

Popular posts from this blog

500+ Supreme Court of India Judgments on Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Head Notes & Citations

1. Mallamma (dead) By Lrs. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. [07-04-2014] 

Presumptions are the Bats of the Law, Flitting in the Twilight, but Disappearing in the Sunshine of Actual Facts [ORDER]

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -  Section 138 -  failure on the part of the complainant to produce his account statement and absence of entry in accounts maintained by him regarding loan advanced to the accused, does show that there was no material to support the basic facts on which the entire case of the complainant was based. Sufficient material was available on record    whereby the defence of the accused became probable. In such a situation, the presumption under the provisions of the Act ceased to operate and the burden fell upon the complainant to prove his case, which he failed to do by placing on record cogent evidence.

When Magistrate may Dispense with Personal Attendance of Accused [SC Judgment] | First Law

Criminal Procedure Code, 1972 - Ss. 205 & 317 - Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused - Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases - Discussed.