Skip to main content

Acid Attack : Important Supreme Court of India Judgments

Criminal Law - Rape Victims - Acid Attack – Conviction; Suresh Chandra Jana v. State of West Bengal, JT 2017 (8) SC 119 : 2017 (8) Scale 697

Criminal Law - Acid Attack - Imprisonment – Determination; Ravada Sasikala v. State of Andhra Pradesh , AIR 2017 SC 1166 : (2017) 4 SCC 546 : JT 2017 (3) SC 8 : 2017 (3) Scale 179

Public Interest Litigation - Acid Attack - Victim – Compensation; Parivartan Kendra v. Union of India, (2016) 3 SCC 571 : JT 2015 (12) SC 14 : 2015 (13) Scale 325

Public Interest Litigation - Acid Attack – Compensation; Laxmi v. U. O. I. , AIR 2015 SC 3662 : 2015 SCR 19 : JT 2015 (12) SC 10 : 2015 (5) Scale 77

Criminal Law - Cancellation of Bail - Acid Attack - Cunning Criminal; Pooja Bhatia v. Vishnu Narain Shivpuri, 2014 (3) SCR 661 : (2014) 13 SCC 492 : 2014 (3) Scale 612

Public Interest Litigation - Acid Attack – Directions; Laxmi v. U. O. I., (2014) 13 SCC 743 : 2013 (14) Scale 615

Constitution of India - Acid Attack – Compensation; Laxmi v. U. O. I. , (2014) 4 SCC 427 : 2013 (9) Scale 291

Constitution of India - Acid Attack; Laxmi v. U. O. I., (2014) 4 SCC 431 : 2013 (9) Scale 290

Criminal Law - Murder - Acid Attack – Conviction; Sri Bhagwan v. State of U. P., 2012 (12) SCR 774 : (2013) 12 SCC 137 : JT 2012 (12) SC 83 : 2012 (11) Scale 734

Criminal Law - Acid Attack - Common Intention – Conviction; Bengai Mandal @ Begai Mandal v. State of Bihar, AIR 2010 SC 686 : 2010 (1) SCR 439 : (2010) 2 SCC 91 : JT 2010 (1) SC 49 : 2010 (1) Scale 182

Criminal Law - Acid Attack - Imprisonment – Reduction; Bengai Mandal @ Begai Mandal v. State of Bihar, AIR 2010 SC 686 : 2010 (1) SCR 439 : (2010) 2 SCC 91 : JT 2010 (1) SC 49 : 2010 (1) Scale 182

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Presumptions are the Bats of the Law, Flitting in the Twilight, but Disappearing in the Sunshine of Actual Facts [ORDER]

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -  Section 138 -  failure on the part of the complainant to produce his account statement and absence of entry in accounts maintained by him regarding loan advanced to the accused, does show that there was no material to support the basic facts on which the entire case of the complainant was based. Sufficient material was available on record    whereby the defence of the accused became probable. In such a situation, the presumption under the provisions of the Act ceased to operate and the burden fell upon the complainant to prove his case, which he failed to do by placing on record cogent evidence.

500+ Supreme Court of India Judgments on Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Head Notes & Citations

1. Mallamma (dead) By Lrs. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. [07-04-2014] 

Adverse Possession | Ravinder Kaur Grewal v. Manjit Kaur, C.A. No. 7764 of 2014 07-08-2019 SC

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA |  Arun Mishra , S. Abdul Nazeer & M.R. Shah C.A. No.7764 of 2014 with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 8332 - ­8333 of 2014 Radhakrishna Reddy (d) Through Lrs. v. G. Ayyavoo & Ors. August 07, 2019 Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 65 - Adverse Possession - Plea of acquisition of title by adverse possession can be taken by plaintiff under Article 65 of the Limitation Act and there is no bar under the Limitation Act, 1963 to sue on aforesaid basis in case of infringement of any rights of a plaintiff. A person in possession cannot be ousted by another person except by due procedure of law and once 12 years' period of adverse possession is over, even owner's right to eject him is lost and the possessory owner acquires right, title and interest possessed by the outgoing person/owner as the case may be against whom he has prescribed. In our opinion, consequence is that once the right, title or interest is acquired it can be used as a sword by the plaintiff as well...