Skip to main content

Indian High Courts Monthly Digest August 2018


Civil P.C. 1908 - Defendants have been found in possession of the suit land on the basis of the sale deed executed in their favour. However, surprisingly, the plaintiffs have neither challenged the aforesaid sale deed nor sought possession of the suit land. Therefore, the suit as filed by the plaintiffs for declaration simplicitor was not at all maintainable; Prem Lal v. Parvinder Singh [Himachal Pradesh High Court, 03-08-2018]

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - A contemnor is not in a position of an accused and contempt proceedings are separate and distinct from criminal proceedings; Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Omi, 07-08-2018 CCP(O) No. 10 of 2018

Contract Act, 1872 - S.27 - No employer has a right to restrain an employee from taking up competing employment after the term of employment. Such a clause is invalid and unenforceable; Deepayan Mohanty v. Cargill India Pvt. Ltd. [Delhi High Court, 03-08-2018]

Designs Act, 2000 - S. 2(d) - "design" - Meaning of - Use of design not substantially different from the registered design would of course, amount to infringement - designs must be protected against imitations since the statutory right of exclusive use is granted only for a limited period of time - Damages can never be an adequate compensation to the plaintiffs if are deprived of their statutory right of commercial exploitation; Dart Industries v. Polyset Plastics [Delhi High Court, 01-08-2018]

Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 - Whether in a suit filed under Section 2 of the Act, the Civil Court was competent to grant the reliefs in respect of maintenance of the children and matrimonial property of the parties, for which other statutory enactments and the other forums are available; Adnan Chara v. Farhat Adnan [Bombay High Court, 02-08-2018]



Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - S.12(1)(a) - Voidable Marriages - Mere non-consummation of marriage is not sufficient for granting a decree for annulment of marriage. Non-consummation of marriage shall be due to the impotence of either spouse; Sanu v. Sandeep, [Kerala High Court, 01-08-2018] bit.ly/MatA491of2018

Injunction - An order of injunction is discretionary order and once the Trial Court exercises a discretion and grants or refuses to grant interim injunction, the same will not be normally interfered with by the Appellate Court, unless it is found that such a discretion has been exercised arbitrarily or capriciously or perversely, or where the court ignored settled principles of law regarding the grant or refusal of interim injunction; Ghulam Mohammad Wani v. Ali Mohammad Ganaie [Jammu & Kashmir High Court, 03-08-2018]

Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - High Court can interfere with a notification fixing minimum wages only on "the most substantial grounds"; Federation of Okhla Industrial Association (Reg.) v. Lt. Governor [Delhi High Court, 04-08-2018]

Penal Code, 1860 - S. 498A - Conviction of the accused, even when the co-accused were acquitted on the same evidence, was liable to be set aside; Balaji v. State of Maharashtra [Bombay High Court, 02-08-2018]

Public Safety - It is not necessary that there should be multiplicity of grounds for making or sustaining an order of detention; Basharat Ahmad Mir v. State [Jammu & Kashmir High Court, 03-08-2018]

State Policy - Right of the State to change its policy from time to time under the changing circumstances cannot be questioned, though the changed policy deviated from the judicial pronouncements of the Supreme Court; Rifat Basheer v. State of J&K [Jammu & Kashmir High Court, 03-08-2018]

Suo motu cognizance - Boy on school picnic falls in water harvesting pit, dies - Held, the Sites of all manholes, pits, holes, tanks or any other opening in the ground of any kinds shall be regularly inspected and maintained; Court On Its Own Motion v. Govt. of Nct [Delhi High Court, 03-08-2018]

Trade Marks Act, 1999 - S.2(z)(g) - Prior user and goodwill are two of the indispensable ingredients, requiring to be positively established by the party seeking injunction, in a passing off action; Turning Point v. Turning Point Institute Pvt. Ltd. [Delhi High Court, 02-08-2018]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adverse Possession | Ravinder Kaur Grewal v. Manjit Kaur, C.A. No. 7764 of 2014 07-08-2019 SC

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA |  Arun Mishra , S. Abdul Nazeer & M.R. Shah C.A. No.7764 of 2014 with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 8332 - ­8333 of 2014 Radhakrishna Reddy (d) Through Lrs. v. G. Ayyavoo & Ors. August 07, 2019 Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 65 - Adverse Possession - Plea of acquisition of title by adverse possession can be taken by plaintiff under Article 65 of the Limitation Act and there is no bar under the Limitation Act, 1963 to sue on aforesaid basis in case of infringement of any rights of a plaintiff. A person in possession cannot be ousted by another person except by due procedure of law and once 12 years' period of adverse possession is over, even owner's right to eject him is lost and the possessory owner acquires right, title and interest possessed by the outgoing person/owner as the case may be against whom he has prescribed. In our opinion, consequence is that once the right, title or interest is acquired it can be used as a sword by the plaintiff as well...

Presumptions are the Bats of the Law, Flitting in the Twilight, but Disappearing in the Sunshine of Actual Facts [ORDER]

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -  Section 138 -  failure on the part of the complainant to produce his account statement and absence of entry in accounts maintained by him regarding loan advanced to the accused, does show that there was no material to support the basic facts on which the entire case of the complainant was based. Sufficient material was available on record    whereby the defence of the accused became probable. In such a situation, the presumption under the provisions of the Act ceased to operate and the burden fell upon the complainant to prove his case, which he failed to do by placing on record cogent evidence.

500+ Supreme Court of India Judgments on Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Head Notes & Citations

1. Mallamma (dead) By Lrs. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. [07-04-2014]