Skip to main content

9 Supreme Court Guidelines should be followed by Trial Courts in the Conduct of a Criminal Trial

The following practice guidelines should be followed by trial courts in the conduct of a criminal trial, as far as possible: 



1. A detailed case­calendar must be prepared at the commencement of the trial after framing of charges; 

2. The case­calendar must specify the dates on which the examination­in­chief and cross­examination (if required) of witnesses is to be conducted; 

3. The case­calendar must keep in view the proposed order of production of witnesses by parties, expected time required for examination of witnesses, availability of witnesses at the relevant time, and convenience of both the prosecution as well as the defence, as far as possible; 

4. Testimony of witnesses deposing on the same subject­matter must be proximately scheduled; 

5. The request for deferral under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. must be preferably made before the preparation of the case­calendar; 

6. The grant for request of deferral must be premised on sufficient reasons justifying the deferral of cross­examination of each witness, or set of witnesses; 

7. While granting a request for deferral of cross­examination of any witness, the trial courts must specify a proximate date for the cross­examination of that witness, after the examination­in­chief of such witness(es) as has been prayed for; 

8. The case­calendar, prepared in accordance with the above guidelines, must be followed strictly, unless departure from the same becomes absolutely necessary; 

9. In cases where trial courts have granted a request for deferral, necessary steps must be taken to safeguard witnesses from being subjected to undue influence, harassment or intimidation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

500+ Supreme Court of India Judgments on Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Head Notes & Citations

1. Mallamma (dead) By Lrs. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. [07-04-2014] 

Presumptions are the Bats of the Law, Flitting in the Twilight, but Disappearing in the Sunshine of Actual Facts [ORDER]

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -  Section 138 -  failure on the part of the complainant to produce his account statement and absence of entry in accounts maintained by him regarding loan advanced to the accused, does show that there was no material to support the basic facts on which the entire case of the complainant was based. Sufficient material was available on record    whereby the defence of the accused became probable. In such a situation, the presumption under the provisions of the Act ceased to operate and the burden fell upon the complainant to prove his case, which he failed to do by placing on record cogent evidence.

When Magistrate may Dispense with Personal Attendance of Accused [SC Judgment] | First Law

Criminal Procedure Code, 1972 - Ss. 205 & 317 - Magistrate may dispense with personal attendance of accused - Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases - Discussed.