Skip to main content

21 Latest Supreme Court Cases Published in (2019) Volume 2 SCC

(2019) 2 SCC 752 | CRIMINAL LAW - Criminal P.C. 1973 - S. 372 - Right of victims to appeal against acquittal - Scope and Applicability of right of “victim” - explained. Madan B. Lokur, S, Abdul Nazeer & Deepak Gupta, JJ. Mallikarjun Kodagali v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2018 SC 5206 : 2019 Cri LJ 532 : 2018 (4) Crimes 123 : 2018 (4) RCR (Criminal) 781 : 2018 (14) Scale 322018 (4) KLT 682 : 2019 (1) KLJ 292 : 2018 (5) KHC 362 Crl.A. No. 1281 of 2018 12-10-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 747 | INSURANCE LAW - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Transfer of Vehicle - Liability of Registered Owner. U.U. Lalit & D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ. Prakash Chand Daga v. Saveta Sharma, AIR 2019 SC 66 : 2019 ACJ 1 : 2019 (1) RCR (Civil) 372 : 2019 (1) SCALE 22 : 2019 (1) KLT SN 1 (C.No.1) C.A. No. 11369 of 2018 14-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 743 | INDUSTRIAL LAW - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - S. 25 H - Applicability - “retrenched employee” - Vacancy - Preference against other applicants. Abhay Manohar Sapre & Indu Malhotra, JJ. Management of the Barara Co-Operative Marketing-cum-Processing Society Limited v. Workman Pratap Singh, AIR 2019 SC 228 : 2019 (1) LLJ 257 C.A. No. 7 of 2019 02-01-2019


(2019) 2 SCC 727 | PROPERTY LAW - Transfer of Property Act, 1882 – Ss. 54, 60 & 123 - Registration Act, 1908 - Ss. 17, 49 & 50 - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - S. 31 - Registered Document - Oral gift - Onus to prove invalidity of a registered sale deed. Jamila Begum v. Shami Mohammed, AIR 2019 SC 72 C.A. No. 1007 of 2013 14-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 703 | CRIMINAL TRIAL - Penal Code, 1860 - Ss. 228A and 376 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - S. 33 - Prohibition on disclosure of name and identity of victims of sexual offences. Madan B. Lokur & Deepak Gupta, JJ. Nipun Saxena v. Union of India, 2019 (1) KHC 199 : 2019 (1) KLD 95 W.P. (C) No. 565 of 2012 11-12-2018



(2019) 2 SCC 684 | CIVIL PROCEDURE - Civil P.C. 1908 - S. 152 - Rectification of earlier Order / Judgment - Scope of deciding a “Note for speaking to the Minutes”. Akhil Bhartvarshiya Marwari Agarwal Jatiya Kosh v. Brijlal Tibrewal, 2019 (1) SCALE 8 C.A. No. 12088 of 2018 14-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 679 | CRIMINAL LAW - Penal Code, 1860 - Ss. 436 & 34 - Family Property Dispute - Cross Complaints - Possibility of False Implication. U.U. Lalit & R. Subhash Reddy, JJ. Shanthamalleshappa v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2019 SC 530 : (2019) 2 SCC 679 : 2019 Cri LJ 1327 : 2018 (4) Crimes 563 : 2019 (1) RCR (Criminal) 229 Crl.A. No. 1583 of 2018 10-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 671 | INSURANCE LAW - Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - S. 3 - Construction of Insurance Exclusions. New India Assurance Company Limited v. Rajeshwar Sharma, 2019 (1) RCR (Civil) 257 C.A. No. 11885 of 2018 07-12-2018


(2019) 2 SCC 660 | | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Natural Justice - Bias - Nemo Debet Esse Judex In Propria Sua Causa - Every adverse order passed against a litigant is injurious to a losing party, however, that does not give him a right to attack the adverse order by attributing bias against Authority / Court. Abhay Manohar Sapre & Indu Malhotra, JJ. Manish S. Pardasani v. Inspector State Excise, C.A. No. 126 of 2019 07-01-2019

(2019) 2 SCC 654 | SERVICE LAW - Appointment - Eligibility Criteria - Tuticorin Port Employees (Temporary Service) Regulations, 1979 - Reg. 2(e), 4, 5(1)(a)(b), 6 - “Pilot” - Qualification of Candidates – Termination Notice - Reinstatement with back wages. R. Banumathi, Indira Banerjee JJ. Chidambaranar Port Trust v. Capt. Paul Nadar Bennet Singh, C.A. No. 11902 of 2018 06-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 636 | CONSTITUTION - Arts. 21, 39 & 41 - Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Rights of the Elderly - Effective implementation of the provisions of the MWP Act. Madan B. Lokur, Deepak Gupta JJ. Ashwani Kumar v. Union of India, 2019 (1) RCR (Criminal) 183 W.P. (C) No. 193 of 2016 13-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 628 | INDUSTRIAL LAW - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - S. 25 F(c) - Notice of retrenchment to be sent to appropriate Government or notified authority, is only directory and not mandatory. Abhay Manohar Sapre & Indu Malhotra, JJ. Manju Saxena v. Union of India, AIR 2019 SC 257 C.A. No. 11766 of 2018 03-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 599 | TAX LAW - Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 - Validity of. A.K. Sikri & Ashok Bhushan, JJ. Union of India v. Mohit Mineral (P) Ltd., AIR 2018 SC 5318 : 2018 (13) Scale 800 C.A. No. 10177 of 2018 03-10-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 596 | CRIMINAL LAW - Criminal P.C. 1973 - Ss. 386(b) & 374 - Appeal against Conviction and Sentence - Proper mode of Disposal. Abhay Manohar Sapre & Indu Malhotra, JJ. Kanubhai Bhagvanbhai Nayak v. State of Gujarat, AIR 2019 SC 544 : 2018 (4) Crimes 507 Crl.A. No. 1540 of 2018 03-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 521 | INFRASTRUCTURE LAW - Telecommunications Laws - Telecom Services / Market and Regulatory Authorities - TRAI, TDSAT, CCI and Other Authorities - Jurisdictions of TRAI and CCI. A.K. Sikri & Ashok Bhushan, JJ. CCI v. Bharti Airtel Ltd., AIR 2019 SC 113 C.A. No. 11843 of 2018 05-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 513 | CRIMINAL LAW - Penal Code, 1860 - S. 302 r/w Ss. 34 & 148 - Murder - Acquittal by Trial Court - Interference by High Court on ground that a different view is possible - Not Permissible - Presumption of innocence gets strengthened by an order of acquittal. L. Nageswara Rao & R. Subhash Reddy, JJ. Mohd. Akhtar v. State of Bihar, 2018 (4) Crimes 482 : JT 2018 (12) SC 68 Crl.A. No. 407 of 2009 04-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 505 | CONSTITUTION - Arts. 226 & 136 - Public Interest Litigation - Interference in policy matters. Ranjan Gogoi CJI, Sanjay Kishan Kaul & K. M. Joseph, JJ. Janhit Manch v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2019 SC 66 : 2019 (1) All.M.R. 460 C.A. No. 10192 of 2010 14-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 499 | PUBLIC PROPERTY - Writ Jurisdiction - Scope of interference by High Court. R. Banumathi & Indira Banerjee JJ. Sanjay Kumar Jha v. Prakash Chandra Chaudhary, C.A. No. 11857 of 2018 05-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 488 | ARBITRATION LAW - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - S.11(6) - Appointment of arbitrator. R. Banumathi & Indira Banerjee JJ. S.P. Singla Constructions (P) Ltd. v. State of H.P., JT 2018 (11) SC 551 : 2019 (1) RCR (Civil) 224 C.A. No. 11824 of 2018 04-12-2018

(2019) 2 SCC 486 | EDUCATION LAW - Medical and Dental Colleges - Affiliation. Sourabh Brala v. Union of India.

Popular posts from this blog

Presumptions are the Bats of the Law, Flitting in the Twilight, but Disappearing in the Sunshine of Actual Facts [ORDER]

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -  Section 138 -  failure on the part of the complainant to produce his account statement and absence of entry in accounts maintained by him regarding loan advanced to the accused, does show that there was no material to support the basic facts on which the entire case of the complainant was based. Sufficient material was available on record    whereby the defence of the accused became probable. In such a situation, the presumption under the provisions of the Act ceased to operate and the burden fell upon the complainant to prove his case, which he failed to do by placing on record cogent evidence.

500+ Supreme Court of India Judgments on Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Head Notes & Citations

1. Mallamma (dead) By Lrs. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. [07-04-2014] 

Adverse Possession | Ravinder Kaur Grewal v. Manjit Kaur, C.A. No. 7764 of 2014 07-08-2019 SC

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA |  Arun Mishra , S. Abdul Nazeer & M.R. Shah C.A. No.7764 of 2014 with S.L.P. (C) Nos. 8332 - ­8333 of 2014 Radhakrishna Reddy (d) Through Lrs. v. G. Ayyavoo & Ors. August 07, 2019 Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 65 - Adverse Possession - Plea of acquisition of title by adverse possession can be taken by plaintiff under Article 65 of the Limitation Act and there is no bar under the Limitation Act, 1963 to sue on aforesaid basis in case of infringement of any rights of a plaintiff. A person in possession cannot be ousted by another person except by due procedure of law and once 12 years' period of adverse possession is over, even owner's right to eject him is lost and the possessory owner acquires right, title and interest possessed by the outgoing person/owner as the case may be against whom he has prescribed. In our opinion, consequence is that once the right, title or interest is acquired it can be used as a sword by the plaintiff as well...