1. M/s. Treaty Construction v. M/s Ruby Tower Co Op Hsg. Society Ltd.
Consumer Law - Pecuniary Jurisdiction - The National Commission has observed, and rightly so, that such a plea was not specifically raised before the State Commission at the earliest opportunity; and the State Commission having already decided the matter on merits, such a technical objection as regards pecuniary jurisdiction could not have been countenanced before the National Commission.
Case Number : C.A. No. 5699 of 2019 19-07-2019
Case Number : C.A. No. 5699 of 2019 19-07-2019
Petitioner's Advocate : Abha R. Sharma
Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
2. Rajesh S/o Shrirambapu Fate v. The State of Maharashtra
For the reasons given by us in our judgment of the date in Civil Appeal No.5444 of 2019, Vishal Ashok Thorat and ors. vs. Rajesh Shrirambapu Fate & Ors. this appeal is dismissed.
Case Number : C.A. No. 5687 of 2019 19-07-2019
Case Number : C.A. No. 5687 of 2019 19-07-2019
Petitioner's Advocate : Sunil Kumar Verma
Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
Judgment By : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
3. Vishal Ashok Thorat v. Rajesh Shrirambapu Fate
Assistant Inspector of Motor Vehicles, Group-C in Motor Vehicles Department (Recruitment) Rules 2016 - Rule 3(iii), Rule 3(iv) and Rule 4 - Validity of.
Service Law - PIL should not be entertained in service matter.
Case Number : C.A. No. 5444 of 2019 19-07-2019
Service Law - PIL should not be entertained in service matter.
Case Number : C.A. No. 5444 of 2019 19-07-2019
Petitioner's Advocate : Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure
Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
Judgment By : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
Comments
Post a Comment